Where global solutions are shaped for you | Disarmament | Generic Preventive Measures - Checklist

ACCESSIBILITY AT UNOG A A A A The United Nations in the Heart of Europe

Generic Preventive Measures - Checklist

To assist States with the implementation of Article 9 and Part 3 of the Technical Annex, in 2009 the then Coordinator on Generic Preventive Measures, Colonel Jean-Christophe Le Roux of France, developed a questionnaire which serves as a checklist for States to consider when they are developing procedures, guidelines or regulations on the implementation of generic preventive measures. The checklist has been reproduced in full below. It can also be found in Protocol V document CCW/P.V/CONF/2010/6/Add.1, 11 November 2010. Essentially the checklist is a tool to facilitate the implementation of generic preventive measures. While it does not have any legal status, it is hoped that the checklist will clarify various issues, establish best practises and serve to monitor and improve the implementation of generic preventive measures at the national level.

Hide details for 1. Specification1. Specification
(a) Has each stage (storage, transport, handling, training, use, …) of the life cycle of munitions been defined, in terms of
    (i) Normal conditions, abnormal conditions and accidental conditions of use
    (ii) Type of environmental conditions and the level to which munitions may be exposed (direct or indirect exposure i.e when integrated in weapon system),
    (iii) Duration of exposure to different environmental conditions,
    (iv) Configuration/ state of munitions during periods of exposure to different environmental conditions,
    (v) Maximum allowable degradation during its operational lifecycle i.e. during storage, transport, handling, use with particular weapons systems …?
    (vi) Is there a requirement for a specified life time?
(b) Are quantitative reliability and safety requirements included in the specification for the entire life cycle?
(c) Is there a maximum allowable UXO rate?
(d) Have the types of targets to be engaged and scenarios of use by munitions been considered and characterized?
(e) Are the impact conditions of the munitions considered i.e. angle of impact of munitions/ type of impact surface?
(f) Has fuse sensitivity been defined in specification?
(g) Are any materials, which are forbidden by international standards or regulations, used?
(h) Which design standards shall be applied during development and production? Are they internationally recognized? If not, is there a comparison matrix between standards?

Show details for 2. Concept2. Concept

Show details for 3. Development3. Development

Hide details for Reducing UXO sensitivityReducing UXO sensitivity
(a) Does the fusing system design include features to prevent initiation of the explosive train (e.g. through depletion of electrical energy) after the operating time of the fusing system has expired? How long does it take for the fusing system of the UXO to become inoperable e.g. for the firing electric energy to be depleted to a level below the minimum current required to initiate the detonator (i.e. non fire current level)?
(b) Does the fusing system incorporate fail-safe design (safe state of the fusing system in case of failure) or sterilisation (e.g. : initiate the primary explosive element in its safe position or deplete energy of the ignition capacitor in order to prevent detonation of the main charge, avoid inadvertent charging of ignition capacitor)?
(c) Have the least sensitive/ most stable explosive components been used in the explosive train (fusing system, main charge…)?

Show details for Reducing potential civilian casualties from ERWReducing potential civilian casualties from ERW

Show details for Qualification workQualification work

Show details for 4. Production4. Production

Show details for 5. Utilisation - 5.1 Storage5. Utilisation - 5.1 Storage

Show details for 5.2 Transportation and handling5.2 Transportation and handling

Show details for 5.3 Training5.3 Training

Show details for 5.4 Using5.4 Using

Show details for 6. Support - 6.1 maintenance of weapon system, munitions and packaging6. Support - 6.1 maintenance of weapon system, munitions and packaging

Show details for 6.2 In service surveillance6.2 In service surveillance

Show details for 6.3 Documentation6.3 Documentation

Show details for 7. Disposal Identification7. Disposal Identification

Show details for ProceduresProcedures

Show details for Information to other partiesInformation to other parties

Show details for 8. COTS and MOTS8. COTS and MOTS

Show details for 9. Others questions for storage related to safety9. Others questions for storage related to safety

List of abbreviations
ALARP: As Low As is Reasonably Practicable
AXO: Abandoned explosive Ordnance
BIT: Built In Test
CCW: Certain Conventional Weapons
COTS: Commercial Off The Shelf
EOD: Explosive Ordnance Disposal
ERW: Explosive Remnants of War (see definition in convention on CCW)
HCP: High Contracting Party
MOTS: Modified Off The Shelf
RFID: Radio Frequency Identification Device
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance (see definition in convention on CCW)