ACCESSIBILITY AT UNOG A A A A The United Nations in the Heart of Europe

Generic Preventive Measures - Checklist



To assist States with the implementation of Article 9 and Part 3 of the Technical Annex, in 2009 the then Coordinator on Generic Preventive Measures, Colonel Jean-Christophe Le Roux of France, developed a questionnaire which serves as a checklist for States to consider when they are developing procedures, guidelines or regulations on the implementation of generic preventive measures. The checklist has been reproduced in full below. It can also be found in Protocol V document CCW/P.V/CONF/2010/6/Add.1, 11 November 2010. Essentially the checklist is a tool to facilitate the implementation of generic preventive measures. While it does not have any legal status, it is hoped that the checklist will clarify various issues, establish best practises and serve to monitor and improve the implementation of generic preventive measures at the national level.

Show details for 1. Specification1. Specification

Show details for 2. Concept2. Concept

Show details for 3. Development3. Development

Show details for Reducing UXO sensitivityReducing UXO sensitivity

Show details for Reducing potential civilian casualties from ERWReducing potential civilian casualties from ERW

Show details for Qualification workQualification work

Show details for 4. Production4. Production

Show details for 5. Utilisation - 5.1 Storage5. Utilisation - 5.1 Storage

Show details for 5.2 Transportation and handling5.2 Transportation and handling

Show details for 5.3 Training5.3 Training

Show details for 5.4 Using5.4 Using

Show details for 6. Support - 6.1 maintenance of weapon system, munitions and packaging6. Support - 6.1 maintenance of weapon system, munitions and packaging

Show details for 6.2 In service surveillance6.2 In service surveillance

Hide details for 6.3 Documentation6.3 Documentation
(a) Is there a user manual for each type of munition?
(b) Is information on munitions and their correct handling available, articulated in suitable terms for the respective level? Is the user of this information trained?
(c) Do the OEMs provide to the users all technical details regarding munitions during the entire life cycle than can reduce or eliminate the probability of UXO?
(d) Is the user manual adapted to different profiles of users (operational, headquarters, maintenance…)?
(e) Are the limits of use defined in the user manual?
(f) Is there safety area defined (for troops, civilians and urban installations)?
(g) In the user manual, are there recommendations about factors that can negatively influence munitions, such as mechanical, thermal, electrical, climatic, biological, polluting, radiating or poisoning hazards?
(h) Are the technical manuals and their translations sufficiently detailed to achieve the objective of reduction of UXO?

Show details for 7. Disposal Identification7. Disposal Identification

Show details for ProceduresProcedures

Show details for Information to other partiesInformation to other parties

Show details for 8. COTS and MOTS8. COTS and MOTS

Show details for 9. Others questions for storage related to safety9. Others questions for storage related to safety

List of abbreviations
ALARP: As Low As is Reasonably Practicable
AXO: Abandoned explosive Ordnance
BIT: Built In Test
CCW: Certain Conventional Weapons
COTS: Commercial Off The Shelf
EOD: Explosive Ordnance Disposal
ERW: Explosive Remnants of War (see definition in convention on CCW)
HCP: High Contracting Party
MOTS: Modified Off The Shelf
RFID: Radio Frequency Identification Device
UXO: Unexploded Ordnance (see definition in convention on CCW)