PRINT PAGE SHARE THIS ACCESSIBILITY AT UNOG A A A A The United Nations in the Heart of Europe

ExpandIn Focus

ExpandResources & Services

ExpandThe Director General

ExpandAbout UNOG

ExpandPalais des Nations


Development - concept to production

Protocol V is one of the very few instruments that addresses the design through to the production of munitions. This is a sensitive area that is generally kept within the domain of national governments and private companies. However, improvements to the design of ammunition and applying strict controls and internationally recognised quality standards throughout the production process can contribute to reducing the rate of unexploded ordnance. This is why High Contracting Parties are urged to take action in these areas.

For a discussion on standardisation across the areas of production to in-service see "A discussion on international harmonisation of the safety and suitability for service assessment" by Dr. Michael W. Sharp, MSIAC.

Specifically on munitions manufacturing management, the third part of the Technical Annex to Protocol V encourages High Contracting Parties to carry out the following measures:

    (i) Production processes should be designed to achieve the greatest reliability of munitions.
    (ii) Production processes should be subject to certified quality control measures.
    (iii) During the production of explosive ordnance, certified quality assurance standards
    that are internationally recognised should be applied.
    (iv) Acceptance testing should be conducted through live-fire testing over a range of
    conditions or through other validated procedures.
    (v) High reliability standards should be required in the course of explosive ordnance
    transactions and transfers.
    (b) Munitions management
    In order to ensure the best possible long-term reliability of explosive ordnance, States are
    encouraged to apply best practice norms and operating procedures with respect to its storage.
Article 36 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions

Under Article 36 of Additional Protocol I, States have an obligation when designing, developing or purchasing new weapons to assess the risks posed by the particular weapon and its compliance with international humanitarian law. This is in line with the direction given to States under Protocol V to ensure that the processes for the production of munitions achieves a high standard of reliability.

Article 36 states: "In the study, development, acquisition or adoption of a new weapon, means or method of warfare, a High Contracting Party is under an obligation to determine whether its employment would, in some or all circumstances, be prohibited by this Protocol or by any other rule of international law applicable to the High Contracting Party."

The ICRC has published "A Guide to the Legal Review of New Weapons, Means and Methods of Warfare: Measures to Implement Article 36 of Additional Protocol I of 1977". International Review of the Red Cross, Volume 88 Number 864 December 2006.

Protocol V does not specifically address the issue of procurement of munitions. For a discussion on this issue see "Report of Expert Group 8 Environmental Engineering" CEN Workshop 10 Standardisation for Defence Procurement Expert Group 8 Environmental Engineering, April 2011

Checklist on the development of munitions

The Protocol V Generic Preventive Measures checklist addresses the development of munitions. Set out below are the questions included in the checklist in the areas of specification, concept, development, qualification work and production.

Hide details for SpecificationSpecification
(a) Has each stage (storage, transport, handling, training, use, …) of the life cycle of munitions been defined, in terms of
(i) Normal conditions, abnormal conditions and accidental conditions of use
(ii) Type of environmental conditions and the level to which munitions may be exposed (direct or indirect exposure i.e when integrated in weapon system),
(iii) Duration of exposure to different environmental conditions,
(iv) Configuration/ state of munitions during periods of exposure to different environmental conditions,
(v) Maximum allowable degradation during its operational lifecycle i.e. during storage, transport, handling, use with particular weapons systems …?
(vi) Is there a requirement for a specified life time?
(b) Are quantitative reliability and safety requirements included in the specification for the entire life cycle?
(c) Is there a maximum allowable UXO rate?
(d) Have the types of targets to be engaged and scenarios of use by munitions been considered and characterized?
(e) Are the impact conditions of the munitions considered i.e. angle of impact of munitions/ type of impact surface?
(f) Has fuse sensitivity been defined in specification?
(g) Are any materials, which are forbidden by international standards or regulations, used?
(h) Which design standards shall be applied during development and production? Are they internationally recognized? If not, is there a comparison matrix between standards?

Show details for ConceptConcept

Show details for DevelopmentDevelopment

Hide details for Qualification workQualification work
(a) Does the qualification program (testing and simulation) cover all military and technical requirements and have the data been recorded and been used to assess the UXO rate and to manage them during the conflict?
(b) Does the qualification program (testing and simulation) have sufficient statistical validity to allow a reliable evaluation of the reliability and safety of munitions in all operational environments?
(c) Is there a safety assessment report which covers all safety aspects (UXO included) for the entire lifecycle?
(d) Is there any independent office or organization to check and approve safety of munitions (e.g. fuse review board, national safety authority …)?

Show details for ProductionProduction

Events & Meetings